Free WSJ.com would require 12x the traffic
Cory Bergman January 2nd, 2008
Bear Stearns analyst Spencer Wang crunches the numbers and determines that WSJ.com would need a 12x increase in traffic to offset the loss in subscription dollars if it moved to a free model.
Adds Rocker in comments: “Lame analysis. $6 (CPM) is absurdly low for this site. WSJ.com at X traffic is worth a multiple of what Yahoo Finance is worth at the same level of traffic. Plus going free opens up syndication/broader distribution options beyond direct site traffic that will expand the footprint and revenue potential, advertising and otherwise. All in all, this is eminently achievable for a company like News Corp.”

1 Comment Add your own
1. Rocker | January 2nd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Lame analysis. $6 is absurdly low for this site. WSJ.com at X traffic is worth a multiple of what Yahoo Finance is worth at the same level of traffic. Plus going free opens up syndication/broader distribution options beyond direct site traffic that will expand the footprint and revenue potential, advertising and otherwise. All in all, this is eminently achievable for a company like News Corp.
Leave a Comment
(Please keep URLs out of the comment body or the spam filter will block you.)Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed