<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday&#8217;s debate plugged on Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/02/saturdays-debate-plugged-on-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/02/saturdays-debate-plugged-on-facebook/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bogopolis</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/02/saturdays-debate-plugged-on-facebook/#comment-657277</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogopolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/02/saturdays-debate-plugged-on-facebook/#comment-657277</guid>
		<description>Is it me or is it odd that the politics page on Facebook is 'sponsored' by a single media outlet (linked included in post header)?  Using this theory - what could stop a political action group, under the guise of a 'media' outlet from sponsoring their own similar page, but labeled with a generic name - thus leading to potential bias?

I'm all for getting 'our' generation engaged, but is it right to have a feature like this sponsored by a 'potentially biased' media outlet?  (I use 'potentially biased' because most in my age group [the core FaceBook demographic] is very cautious against established media...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it me or is it odd that the politics page on Facebook is &#8217;sponsored&#8217; by a single media outlet (linked included in post header)?  Using this theory - what could stop a political action group, under the guise of a &#8216;media&#8217; outlet from sponsoring their own similar page, but labeled with a generic name - thus leading to potential bias?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for getting &#8216;our&#8217; generation engaged, but is it right to have a feature like this sponsored by a &#8216;potentially biased&#8217; media outlet?  (I use &#8216;potentially biased&#8217; because most in my age group [the core FaceBook demographic] is very cautious against established media&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
