<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current TV files for IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/28/current-tv-files-for-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/28/current-tv-files-for-ipo/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/28/current-tv-files-for-ipo/#comment-738524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/28/current-tv-files-for-ipo/#comment-738524</guid>
		<description>Current tends to run their content both online and on the network. And they're not pitching to viewers, per se: they're pitching to *producers*.

IMHO, the content on Current is light years better than what's avail on YouTube, et al. That's what they've really got going for them: a solid, semi-pro (and better) community of producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current tends to run their content both online and on the network. And they&#8217;re not pitching to viewers, per se: they&#8217;re pitching to *producers*.</p>
<p>IMHO, the content on Current is light years better than what&#8217;s avail on YouTube, et al. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve really got going for them: a solid, semi-pro (and better) community of producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
