<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN.com now linking non-IB affiliates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-722742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-722742</guid>
		<description>I love the comparison to Fark here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the comparison to Fark here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-722481</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-722481</guid>
		<description>CNN's pathfire still stinks compared to nbcnewschannel.com in terms of web-ready video for the locals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN&#8217;s pathfire still stinks compared to nbcnewschannel.com in terms of web-ready video for the locals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721447</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721447</guid>
		<description>I have to second tdc's comment about the stations that seem to be holding most of the limelight.

There are several days of the week when all you see is one station's call letters for an entire region of the US.

Sure, some stations are good, but the "best stories win" line seems to hold more weight for certain stations rather than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to second tdc&#8217;s comment about the stations that seem to be holding most of the limelight.</p>
<p>There are several days of the week when all you see is one station&#8217;s call letters for an entire region of the US.</p>
<p>Sure, some stations are good, but the &#8220;best stories win&#8221; line seems to hold more weight for certain stations rather than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721343</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721343</guid>
		<description>cory, thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cory, thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721243</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721243</guid>
		<description>(by rolling up, I mean into Nielsen-Netratings under the CNN Digital Network)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(by rolling up, I mean into Nielsen-Netratings under the CNN Digital Network)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721241</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721241</guid>
		<description>tdc... CNN rolled in the IB affils (minus NBC) after they invested in IB.   They won't be rolling up affiliates outside that arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tdc&#8230; CNN rolled in the IB affils (minus NBC) after they invested in IB.   They won&#8217;t be rolling up affiliates outside that arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721220</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721220</guid>
		<description>Got a call from CNN the other day ... they're creating a web assignment desk and are seeking out web contacts at all their affiliates. 

The first contact was just a 'Hey what's your name, how do I get a hold of you' sort of deal, but the person at the CNN mothership said they would be sending out some sort of e-mail talking about what their plans are to better connect with the affils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a call from CNN the other day &#8230; they&#8217;re creating a web assignment desk and are seeking out web contacts at all their affiliates. </p>
<p>The first contact was just a &#8216;Hey what&#8217;s your name, how do I get a hold of you&#8217; sort of deal, but the person at the CNN mothership said they would be sending out some sort of e-mail talking about what their plans are to better connect with the affils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721066</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-721066</guid>
		<description>The "Florida section" comment was a reference to Fark, which has a specific tag for stupid things occurring in Florida.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Florida section&#8221; comment was a reference to Fark, which has a specific tag for stupid things occurring in Florida.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720936</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720936</guid>
		<description>btw-

congrats cory.

would it be fair to assume that nielsen's monthly numbers for "cnn digital network" will now include over 200 locals?

that ought to get 'em over yahoo!news once and for all... (well, at least until nielsen starts publishing how many are included in each of these 'networks').</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw-</p>
<p>congrats cory.</p>
<p>would it be fair to assume that nielsen&#8217;s monthly numbers for &#8220;cnn digital network&#8221; will now include over 200 locals?</p>
<p>that ought to get &#8216;em over yahoo!news once and for all&#8230; (well, at least until nielsen starts publishing how many are included in each of these &#8216;networks&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdc</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720928</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720928</guid>
		<description>hopefully they get someone  else choosing the stories who doesn't have "their proven track record" tied to kc, detroit and wisconsin... that section has been rigged for the last several months.

YES, LAST SEVERAL MONTHS!

if i was any of the other affilates i'd be super pissed how this was handled since the start.

seems to have subsided just within the last 2 weeks though.

curious timing, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopefully they get someone  else choosing the stories who doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;their proven track record&#8221; tied to kc, detroit and wisconsin&#8230; that section has been rigged for the last several months.</p>
<p>YES, LAST SEVERAL MONTHS!</p>
<p>if i was any of the other affilates i&#8217;d be super pissed how this was handled since the start.</p>
<p>seems to have subsided just within the last 2 weeks though.</p>
<p>curious timing, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720758</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720758</guid>
		<description>Maybe CNN will create a new Florida section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe CNN will create a new Florida section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brink</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720710</link>
		<dc:creator>Brink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/cnncom-now-linking-non-ib-affiliates/#comment-720710</guid>
		<description>CNN is developing a new relationship with affils and has been making calls to web producers, soliticing their contributions. They'll place the links to the stories they like best on CNN.com. Kinda like Fark, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN is developing a new relationship with affils and has been making calls to web producers, soliticing their contributions. They&#8217;ll place the links to the stories they like best on CNN.com. Kinda like Fark, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
