<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s experimenting with new search tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/#comment-723654</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/#comment-723654</guid>
		<description>Heh, I like that there's a Google AdWords ad titled, "Don't Sign Up For Google AdWords!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I like that there&#8217;s a Google AdWords ad titled, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Sign Up For Google AdWords!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorman</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/#comment-722515</link>
		<dc:creator>Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/01/30/googles-experimenting-with-new-search-tools/#comment-722515</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Don't know if it all will be actually useful, but interesting. I'm surprised that their left- and right-hand contextual stuff wasn't a bit more robust, to respond to Ask's search page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Don&#8217;t know if it all will be actually useful, but interesting. I&#8217;m surprised that their left- and right-hand contextual stuff wasn&#8217;t a bit more robust, to respond to Ask&#8217;s search page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
