Losing my remote: Jumping from TV to newspapers
Liz Foreman February 11th, 2008
Eight months ago, I truly lost my remote, leaving my job as manager of a local TV station website to do multimedia work at a metro newspaper. (Well, I actually left for an awesome job that I had to ultimately turn down due to family issues.) Anyway, I’ve gotten questions from TV lifers who are wondering what it’s like to work at a paper, so here goes…
The major differences:
1. Newspapers are bigger
Duh, but there’s just no comprehending this until you work at a paper. I must have met hundreds of people in my first week.
As a result of their size, you will attend more meetings, produce more reports and answer a whole LOT more email. Each project is run by quite a few people in many departments. We occupy several floors of a downtown high-rise. Ya know, it’s just…bigger.
There are also many, many reporters. Sure, newspaper staffs are shrinking, but to someone who has worked in TV for 10 years, the reporting staff seems like an army. Newspapers have the capacity to do in-depth reporting. Awesome!
Newspapers also have editors and copy editors. (I still don’t understand why TV stations don’t have copy editors.)
2. Shhhhhh…..Newspapers are quiet
This is perhaps a tad superficial, though it was a big enough change in environment that I thought it was worth mentioning. Newspapers are nearly on the level of library-quiet. Speaking of, we have our own library and librarians. Isn’t that cool?!? On the other hand, I kinda miss the police scanners echoing through the newsroom.
3. Newspapers are still learning to be urgent
No one runs through the newsroom, arms flapping, crowing that we need to break in to TV programming. Everything is done a little more calmly than I’m used to. Whereas I felt like the cool cucumber at the TV station, the newspaper folks think of me as the nutty lady who runs around. There is probably a happy medium, and TV folks hired to work at newspaper websites can help offer a little more urgency.
4. Newspapers are serious about online
My boss’ mantra: ‘Write for online, update for print’ permeates the newspaper newsroom but the online thinking also extends into other departments for a very good reason - online is a serious money-making component of the business. Although many TV stations are getting more excited about the web, their websites just aren’t bringing in the bucks like newspaper sites are (I know, there are exceptions,) and consequently they just aren’t as serious about it.
5. Newspapers are diving into new things, like video
Many newspapers have been tackling video online but too few have been strategic about it. As a result, newspapers need folks not only to shoot and edit video but also to help the staff understand what types of video will work online and how to monetize their video efforts.
———-
So, what’s a typical newspaper video gig?
Based on my experience, the job is akin to my early days of running a TV news website - you must be a good salesperson, good at collaborating with other departments and religious about communicating what works and doesn’t work.
1. Strategy
As I wrote before, newspapers are seeking to create more regular video content, but this should be done in a consistent way. Haphazard video producing will provide an unpredictable user experience and fewer repeat customers, unless you have users who like guessing if they’ll have a sports video on Mondays and a news video on Tuesdays and so on.
2. Help other people shoot and edit video
Depending on the size of the paper, you may be the only full-time video staffer. In my case, there are two and the other person has been at the paper for more than a decade. This means you will help train still photographers, reporters and other staff to shoot as well.
Gannett, my company, has a corporately-run video training program, however not all newspapers have this luxury. And besides, once folks are trained, they’ll have technical questions galore about the camera, the video editing software, encoding video for the web - you name it. You will, without fail, become a video helpdesk.
3. Tech stuff
Keep in mind that someone on the newspaper staff needs to become a “chief engineer” of sorts, dealing with broken cameras, inventorying equipment, etc. (an award-winning, meticulous videographer takes care of this where I work,) so if this isn’t your bag, this kind of job may not be for you.
There’s also the video player to think about. Gannett is embarking on a solid new video vendor, however, not all newspapers have that benefit. Making sure you have the tools to succeed is always part of the job!
4. Motivate/inspire
I’ll say it again - newspapers are big places. There are many, many initiatives going on at all times. Newspaper video managers are ambassadors - reminding staff that we “do” video, suggesting video ideas during the story planning process and politely saying certain ideas won’t make good videos, motivating newsroom staffers to shoot video and disseminating video statistics so that people can observe traffic growth.
It’s your job to keep up on video trends to help your fellow newspaper folks to understand what is good for revenue and audience, what is do-able and what isn’t. Ultimately, it is the video manager’s job to make video a success on the newspaper’s website.
5. Video revenue
Video is another content/revenue stream, and as audience is expected to grow, so are revenues. I’ve had quite a bit of fun in this area, working with our talented sales team to come up with packages and measure results for clients.
That’s my “lost my remote” list. I’m eager to read your thoughts in the comments area.


8 Comments Add your own
1. bonita sarita | February 12th, 2008 at 8:17 am
Lately I’ve been getting my newspaper newsroom fix from The Wire but this is even better. I worked in tv news for 7 years and left to work for a PBS station. The difference in pace was the biggest change for me. I never thought I’d be able to leave the news biz but now I don’t know if I could go back!
Great post, thanks for the insight.
2. David Johnson | February 12th, 2008 at 9:37 am
nutty lady… ha!
how are you handling diction and presentation with your newsies? do they get on-camera coaching?
also, we’re interested in where newspapers go in terms of content– are you drifting more towards broadcast style or documentary style?
3. Mel Taylor | February 12th, 2008 at 10:05 am
liz,
that’s an awesome report, one in which i can relate to.
i too, left TV and moved into newspaper recently.
your rundown of experiences are very accurate !
if only TV knew how serious newspaper is in regards to online video.
mel
4. Rob | February 12th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Liz … really interesting, eye opening stuff there. I went the other direction from newspaper to TV so I liked reading how things turned out going in the opposite direction.
Your boss’ mantra … If you don’t mind I’m going to share that with my boss, although I’ll substitute ‘print’ for ‘TV’,
5. seth | February 13th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Liz… Thanks for sharing! As you compare the size of a newspaper operation to that of a TV station, I can’t help but wonder what the future holds.
Will TV add writers and sales people to cater to niche and beat audiences online (and on-air)? Will newspapers continue to downsize and will that compromise some of their content depth?
I asked each of those as questions (to which I’d answer “yes”).
The real question is which old media will hit the right size first - and at what cost to margins, content and community?
When it’s all said and done, will our products differ much? Will our staff? Our resources?
6. oakling | February 13th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
I love that newspapers can do more in-depth reporting, but I wish they would do more than they do. I see far more Associated Press here-are-the-facts-let’s-not-acknowledge-any-bias pap in the SF Chronicle than thoughtful, well-written and well-researched reporting, even though they have those resources.
7. Every Internet Game | February 15th, 2008 at 3:27 am
personally i prefer the internet
you can stay connected to everything that is happening the minute it happens
you dont have to wait until tomorrow or tonight when something happens
you just read about it as it progresses and that is a plus
in addition you can do many things at once on the internet
i play online games such as online poker and online backgammon, win money, read news, listen to music, all at the same time.
you can’t do that with the tv or the newspaper
8. Anthony Moor | March 1st, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Great post, Liz,
When I traded 15 years in TV for newspaper.coms back in 2001 I was stunned at how much bigger Rochester NY’s newspaper newsroom was than KRON’s in San Francisco. I remember flapping my arms around too, wondering, ‘why don’t these guys care that a plane’s down?’
But these print guys are getting ‘breaking news’ again — it’s not like they didn’t know what it was, it’s more that they’re rusty because they’d ceded that franchise to TV back in the early 80s when live trucks and 24 hour news channels were born. And when afternoon dailies died around the country the last of the ‘breaking news’ print products died too.
One of the things I enjoy the most about working in print is that these people are SMART. And committed to community service. Now, I don’t mean to knock my erstwhile colleagues in TV — but let’s face it, reporters have always been about showbiz as much as journalism. (Why is being an anchor a step ‘up’ from being a reporter — unless it’s about the money, personal prestige and showbiz?) At newspapers it’s about serving a community by communicating the things they need to know — nuance and all.
I do hope as newspapers and TV converge on the Web, that the values so evident in print come along as well — along with maybe a bit more arm flapping than before!
Leave a Comment
(Please keep URLs out of the comment body or the spam filter will block you.)Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed