<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cable firms join forces on targeted ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/11/cable-firms-join-forces-on-targeted-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/11/cable-firms-join-forces-on-targeted-ads/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/11/cable-firms-join-forces-on-targeted-ads/#comment-795849</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/11/cable-firms-join-forces-on-targeted-ads/#comment-795849</guid>
		<description>What would be more interesting is how many subscribers they can target without violating their municipal franchise exclusivity agreements. 

Seattle, for example, has strict privacy terms in its agreement with Comcast that would bar the company from providing subscriber information specific to a receiver box to any third party without a court order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be more interesting is how many subscribers they can target without violating their municipal franchise exclusivity agreements. </p>
<p>Seattle, for example, has strict privacy terms in its agreement with Comcast that would bar the company from providing subscriber information specific to a receiver box to any third party without a court order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
