<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to TV: We want to work with you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828661</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828661</guid>
		<description>Run! Run Like Hell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run! Run Like Hell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocker</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828450</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828450</guid>
		<description>The problem with broadcasting is....the whole concept of broadcasting.  There will always be a need for huge numbers of people to occasionally come together to watch things like breaking news, sports and other events.  But the need for multiple channels that any any given time are blasting out  stuff like "Judge Judy" et al so everyone has to watch in real time whenever we put it on?  What's the point?  So I'm arguing for a downsizing, a recalibration, of the whole concept of broadcasting.  As long as people are still watching we need to manage the business, but we also need to project ahead to the day when the model truly is obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with broadcasting is&#8230;.the whole concept of broadcasting.  There will always be a need for huge numbers of people to occasionally come together to watch things like breaking news, sports and other events.  But the need for multiple channels that any any given time are blasting out  stuff like &#8220;Judge Judy&#8221; et al so everyone has to watch in real time whenever we put it on?  What&#8217;s the point?  So I&#8217;m arguing for a downsizing, a recalibration, of the whole concept of broadcasting.  As long as people are still watching we need to manage the business, but we also need to project ahead to the day when the model truly is obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ha</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828205</link>
		<dc:creator>ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-828205</guid>
		<description>google... destroy broadcasting? I think broadcasting is doing a pretty good job destroying itself, thank you. 

Get with the times, dinosaurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google&#8230; destroy broadcasting? I think broadcasting is doing a pretty good job destroying itself, thank you. </p>
<p>Get with the times, dinosaurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-827899</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/03/28/google-to-tv-we-want-to-work-with-you/#comment-827899</guid>
		<description>Interesting positioning.  If their model follows that of radio it will be bottom of the barrel rates.  Has anyone looked a Dish to see what they are selling?  It is 1-800 Fowers etc.  A word to broadcasters beware.  Google is all about Google and they will distroy your industry as they have distroyed Newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting positioning.  If their model follows that of radio it will be bottom of the barrel rates.  Has anyone looked a Dish to see what they are selling?  It is 1-800 Fowers etc.  A word to broadcasters beware.  Google is all about Google and they will distroy your industry as they have distroyed Newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
