<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alexa revamps ranking system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/</link>
	<description>Where TV Finds the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tdc- the real one</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890957</link>
		<dc:creator>tdc- the real one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890957</guid>
		<description>"juicing the numbers"

nobody does that, do they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;juicing the numbers&#8221;</p>
<p>nobody does that, do they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Day</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890623</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890623</guid>
		<description>Bill G - you proved my point. There still isn't a good way. Very few sites have a Quantcast pixel inserted... making it useless.

Anonymous #1 - I know the site isn't accurate because I can compare it with what I know to be true. Say we have a big spike... and the pageviews on Alexa don't show it -- or even a slump.  It also can be manipulated pretty easily (we had a shopping site here in town juicing the numbers and going out telling advertisers that they beat all the big news sites in town... and advertisers believed it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill G - you proved my point. There still isn&#8217;t a good way. Very few sites have a Quantcast pixel inserted&#8230; making it useless.</p>
<p>Anonymous #1 - I know the site isn&#8217;t accurate because I can compare it with what I know to be true. Say we have a big spike&#8230; and the pageviews on Alexa don&#8217;t show it &#8212; or even a slump.  It also can be manipulated pretty easily (we had a shopping site here in town juicing the numbers and going out telling advertisers that they beat all the big news sites in town&#8230; and advertisers believed it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890621</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-890621</guid>
		<description>If only there were a single company that we were forced to accept as correct, like with broadcast metrics, there wouldn't be this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only there were a single company that we were forced to accept as correct, like with broadcast metrics, there wouldn&#8217;t be this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill G</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-889302</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-889302</guid>
		<description>"there still isn’t an accurate way to compare sites and get a good read on traffic"

Not entirely true.

For sites that are "quantified" [i.e. they've inserted the Quantcast pixel into their pages], Quantcast.com is nearly perfectly accurate. Their data closely mirrors our Google Analytics and our own server logs.

The problem is that relatively very few sites are currently  "quantified", so while the data is good, comparisons may be hard to come by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there still isn’t an accurate way to compare sites and get a good read on traffic&#8221;</p>
<p>Not entirely true.</p>
<p>For sites that are &#8220;quantified&#8221; [i.e. they've inserted the Quantcast pixel into their pages], Quantcast.com is nearly perfectly accurate. Their data closely mirrors our Google Analytics and our own server logs.</p>
<p>The problem is that relatively very few sites are currently  &#8220;quantified&#8221;, so while the data is good, comparisons may be hard to come by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-888847</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-888847</guid>
		<description>Ugh, they got rid of the best feature: long-term charts. Now you can't see, for example, how this year's Superbowl site performed compared to the year before. And you certainly can't see how this year's candidate sites compare to the sites 4 years ago. You can't see long-term trends at all. Just 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, they got rid of the best feature: long-term charts. Now you can&#8217;t see, for example, how this year&#8217;s Superbowl site performed compared to the year before. And you certainly can&#8217;t see how this year&#8217;s candidate sites compare to the sites 4 years ago. You can&#8217;t see long-term trends at all. Just 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-888784</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/2008/04/16/alexa-revamps-ranking-system/#comment-888784</guid>
		<description>How would you know if Alexa is accurate or not? It doesn't chart absolute traffic, it tracks relative traffic. Don't turn to it to find out how many people visited your site, use it to compare your site to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you know if Alexa is accurate or not? It doesn&#8217;t chart absolute traffic, it tracks relative traffic. Don&#8217;t turn to it to find out how many people visited your site, use it to compare your site to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
