Comments on: KIFI News Group goes live with WiNG technology

By: ycfmrsxl kfjyizlu

ycfmrsxl kfjyizlu — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:48:16 +0000

rognha agedfjxb pinehwy lydqwcg luqv elzcytgpw tsqy

By: Muck Raker

Muck Raker — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:50:00 +0000

Bill Fesh’s analogy is right on.

The GM of a television station is pimping (and using) technology that he states up front is “near broadcast quality.” When did television broadcasters make the decision that “near” broadcast qualioty was good enough?

The latency in the demonstration piece was irritating and the audio was marginal at best. But if doing local news “almost good enough” and doing it on the cheap are the objectives, they may be onto something.

If I’m their competition, I’m hoping tyhey use this system a lot.

By: bill fesh

bill fesh — Wed, 14 May 2008 20:57:01 +0000

We are also testing it with another vendor. Until the speeds increase or your competition chooses to get rid of their live trucks, it would be wise to keep yours.

If they have a gun and someone tells you a knife will be good enough, chances are you’ll end up in the morgue

By: Don Day

Don Day — Wed, 14 May 2008 02:58:52 +0000

The WorldNow website platform is less than ideal…

By: Steve

Steve — Tue, 13 May 2008 23:55:09 +0000

Ditto. KIFI video is fail.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:34:42 +0000

I would but their website uses a platform that almost always freezes XP and starts and stops all the time when it DOES work. How retarded! I have 384 MB of DDR and a Sempron in there with more than a postage stamp for a hard disk drive and have been at this since the late 1970s. If the video is from Beirut I would expect bad video but I have already seen the stuff break down I can bet.

It doesn’t matter HOW the video was obtained if the Website Player Doesn’t WORK!