<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lost Remote &#187; David Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lostremote.com/author/david-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lostremote.com</link>
	<description>Where TV Meets Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Europe: Internet will surpass TV in 14 months</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/04/09/europe-internet-will-surpass-tv-in-14-months/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/04/09/europe-internet-will-surpass-tv-in-14-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Microsoft report, &#8220;Europe logs on: Internet trends of today and tomorrow,&#8221; finds that European Internet consumption in 2010 will average 14.2 hours per week compared to 11.5 hours a week spent watching TV. Aside from telling us that Europeans watch way less TV than Americans do (Nielsen has the average American watching 28 hours [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Media/News/897321/European-internet-consumption-overtake-TV-14-months/">Microsoft report, &#8220;Europe logs on: Internet trends of today and tomorrow</a>,&#8221; finds that European Internet consumption in 2010 will average 14.2 hours per week compared to 11.5 hours a week spent watching TV. Aside from telling us that Europeans watch way less TV than Americans do (Nielsen has the average American watching 28 hours per week), the report has some trends that are worth noting:</p>
<ul>
<li>While the Internet becomes more popular, it doesn&#8217;t mean that TV viewing is declining. It does mean that the viewer experience is changing.</li>
<li>TV is becoming a two-way experience via PC, mobile, and set-top boxes.</li>
<li>Research clearly shows 18-24 year olds regard the PC as the only TV screen. </li>
<li>One in seven 18-24 year olds now watch no live TV at all</li>
<li>Over the next five years, the PC will decline as the primary Internet access device. Today it powers 95% of access, with the rising trends in mobile, game consoles and Internet-TV devices, PC&#8217;s will represent 50% of internet access.</li>
</ul>
<p>The linked story also offered this quote:<br />
<em>Jeffrey Cole, centre for digital future director at USC Annenberg School, said: &#8220;Rather than shrinking, television will only grow in importance. TV no longer refers to the big screen in the home but to audio and visual content that will be watched everywhere. It will become our constant companion as it escapes from the home for the first time via the mobile phone and netbook PC.&#8221;</em></p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5913&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/04/09/europe-internet-will-surpass-tv-in-14-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Pew State of the News Media</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/16/2009-pew-state-of-the-news-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/16/2009-pew-state-of-the-news-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2009 edition of Pew&#8217;s annual State of the News Media Report paints a fairly bleak picture of what 2008 actually looked like, and ventures to guess that things are not going to get much better in 2009. The key finding are here, read it for all sectors. Below are some pulled quotes and points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/index.htm">2009 edition of Pew&#8217;s annual State of the News Media Report</a> paints a fairly bleak picture of what 2008 actually looked like, and ventures to guess that things are not going to get much better in 2009. The key finding are <a href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/narrative_overview_keyindicators.php?cat=2&#038;media=1">here</a>, read it for all sectors. Below are some pulled quotes and points pertinent to local television and online:</p>
<p><strong>Audience</strong>: The big online sites are pulling the big audiences now, which are drawing them with aggregated content from wires and legacy media. Yahoo, MSNBC, CNN, and AOL are the top news sites, growing at twice the rate of last year. The 24-hour &#8220;on demand&#8221; culture now rules, scheduled broadcasts and established news cycles are broken. </p>
<blockquote><p>Local television remained the nationâ€™s most popular source for news, but, on a percentage basis, it was among the biggest losers of audience in 2008. Just over half of Americans are now regular viewers (52%), according to a survey, down from nearly two-thirds (64%) a decade earlier. Viewership of local evening newscasts, those around the dinner hour, fell by an average of 4.5%, according to an analysis of ratings data by PEJ. Morning and mid-day newscasts held basically stable. Even the trend toward adding new shows in new timeslots seems to have slowed.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Economics</strong>: The economic downturn has hit the media industry at a very bad time, and the ad forecast for 2009 is downright chilling, but this doesn&#8217;t account for all of it. The report finally recognizes that the Internet breaks supplychains and middlemen, saying the current advertising spending trend &#8220;also reflects the powerful structural shifts brought on by digital technology, which has allowed those who want to reach consumers to do so <strong>without the news media as intermediary</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>In local television, a deteriorating market for advertising had analysts scrambling to revise their estimates downward as the year wore on. Most concluded that the final revenue numbers were as much as 7% lower than the year before and that profit margins had probably been cut in half.  And that came during an election, a bad sign for a sector that counts on political ads to replenish coffers every two years. Local television is being particularly hurt by the collapse of the auto industry, its biggest advertiser.</p></blockquote>
<p>In overall ad spending, cable is gaining the biggest share where newspapers and magazines are losing the most. Online ad spending is almost completely benefiting Google and other search providers.  </p>
<p><strong>Investment</strong>: Aside from cable, there was virtually no investment in newsrooms in 2008. 2009 could be worse. </p>
<blockquote><p>The news teams Americans say they most rely on â€“ the familiar faces at the local television stations â€“ also shrank in 2008. Fewer stations reported hiring, and the median staff size slid from an all-time high the previous year as news directors looked for ways to combine newsgathering functions. The move to expand or add news programs also appeared to be slowing. A big capital infusion in equipment for the conversion to digital broadcasting came to a close. And by the end of the year layoffs were accelerating.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Ownership</strong>: Newspaper stock prices fell 83% in 2008. People are waking up to the reality that stand-alone news companies can survive as publicly traded stocks is pretty much dead. There are no buyers for media assets. </p>
<blockquote><p>In local television, which had been a financial bright spot, the situation dimmed. With credit tight and revenues declining, the number of television stations bought was half the figure reported the year before and the lowest since 2004. According to one accounting, 96 stations were sold from January to December 2008, with a total value of $866 million. This compared with 270 in all of 2007 for a value of $4.6 billion. The stock values of publicly traded companies that own stations plunged.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Digital Trends</strong>: Expansion and innovation are coming from <strong>outside of traditional news industries</strong>. It is clear that banner advertising in the current form cannot supply sufficient revenue to replace lost dollars and support worldwide newsgathering operations. No media company has figured out a way to monetize search advertising paired with news content. </p>
<blockquote><p><strong> Economically, one growing cause of concern for news is that national websites and aggregators like Google are fast making inroads in attracting local advertising.</strong> That means even if online advertising returns to big growth rates of two years ago, it may not help news organizations as much as once thought. Over the past decade, the share of Internet advertising derived from local businesses has doubled, by some estimates to 40%, but most of those ads (57% in 2007) are now going to national Internet-only sites like Google and Yahoo, not to local news organizations.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In online content, citizen news sites that do original reporting gained some steam in 2008, especially in areas where traditional coverage has vanished. But, according to a study of citizen sites in 46 markets, they remain far from a substitute for legacy media. Their range of topics is narrower, the sourcing somewhat thinner and the content often not updated even once a day. They also trail legacy news sites in the various methods for distributing their content.</p></blockquote>
<p>Finally, the key findings summary notes that &#8220;Refugees of the mainstream press helped launch or staff a number of independent new ventures online.&#8221; There is a review of some of the more notable new ventures <a href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2009/narrative_special_newventures.php?cat=2&#038;media=12">here</a>. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5888&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/16/2009-pew-state-of-the-news-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>211</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart open thread</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-open-thread/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-open-thread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, you&#8217;d have to live under a rock or be Amish not to have seen or heard about Jon Stewart&#8217;s CNBC smackdown and the literal &#8220;money punch&#8221; he delivered last night to Jim Cramer. Either that or I&#8217;m not following you on twitter because that is what everyone seems to be twitterpated about today. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, you&#8217;d have to live under a rock or be Amish not to have seen or heard about Jon Stewart&#8217;s CNBC smackdown and the literal &#8220;money punch&#8221; he <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=220534&#038;title=intro-brawl-street-get-ready-to&#038;episodeId=220533">delivered last night to Jim Cramer</a>. Either that or <a href="http://www.twitter.com/darthcheeta">I&#8217;m not following you on twitter</a> because that is what <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%22Daily+Show%22">everyone seems to be twitterpated about today</a>. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been paying attention to The Daily Show <a href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/10/06/study-daily-show-is-legitimate-news/">for a long time</a> here at LR, and we&#8217;re not alone. Stewart likes to remind us regularly that he&#8217;s a funny man, not a newsman. But, he&#8217;s doing a lot of things that funny newsmen have been doing for a long time, and he&#8217;s doing them better than they ever did. I&#8217;ll venture to say that Stewart represents a new brand of video-powered columnist, speaking truth to power in both politics and news media, and in the instance of his famous <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmj6JADOZ-8">Crossfire appearance</a>, sometimes both at the same time. Then again, I also bash my students when they write ledes that look like those from The Onion, but that&#8217;s for another post (but if you write like the people who are making fun of you, think twice, ok?)</p>
<p>The question I have is, are the news directors paying attention? Years after Crossfire, CNN still covers politics as theater or, worse, as sports, talking about the reds vs. the blues instead of focusing on the issues. Will CNBC take the hard look in the mirror that Stewart asks and change their ways? Will the industry continue to blame to the Internet for their decline, failing to realize that it is the people &#8211; their customers- who sit behind those networked computers and chose to tune them out or take matters into their own hands and publish on their own? Dave Winer, creator of RSS, said it recently: &#8220;<a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/03/02/deathOfJournalismPart3.html#p15">Dear news people &#8212; WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE JOB YOU&#8217;RE DOING.</a>&#8221; </p>
<p>Will Bunch had a great piece earlier <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/What_battered_newsrooms_can_learn_from_Stewarts_CNBC_takedown.html">on what battered journalists can learn from all this</a>. Let&#8217;s hear what the LR Faithful have to say. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5885&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/jon-stewart-open-thread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Ad Sense adds interest-based advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/google-ad-sense-adds-interest-based-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/google-ad-sense-adds-interest-based-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Goog is working on a new behavior-targeting platform that will identify users based upon their topical interests to try to serve them more interesting ads. This is nothing that other ad networks, like Tacoda for one, haven&#8217;t been doing for a while now. From the blog anouncement: To develop interest categories, we&#8217;ll recognize the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Goog is working on a <a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2009/03/driving-monetization-with-ads-that.html">new behavior-targeting platform</a> that will identify users based upon their topical interests to try to serve them more interesting ads. This is nothing that other ad networks, like Tacoda for one, haven&#8217;t been doing for a while now. From the blog anouncement:</p>
<blockquote><p>To develop interest categories, we&#8217;ll recognize the types of webpages users visit across the AdSense network. As an example, if they visit a number of sports pages, we&#8217;ll add them to the &#8220;sports enthusiast&#8221; interest category.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the local space, one wonders if Google will be tracking interest in geographical locations, considering them as topical interests. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5884&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/13/google-ad-sense-adds-interest-based-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DrupalCon rocks Washington DC</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/06/drupalcon-rocks-washington-dc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/06/drupalcon-rocks-washington-dc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been in and out of DrupalConDC all week, and it is amazing to see how the little open-source cms has gone completely prime time, powering sites for major media and small indies. If you are looking to go the next steps to take your hyperlocal schemes to community-driven publishing, drupal can take you places [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in and out of <a href="http://dc2009.drupalcon.org/">DrupalConDC</a> all week, and it is amazing to see how the little open-source cms has gone completely prime time, powering sites for major media and small indies. If you are looking to go the next steps to take your hyperlocal schemes to community-driven publishing, drupal can take you places that simple blogware like wordpress simply can&#8217;t. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5883&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/03/06/drupalcon-rocks-washington-dc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>462</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rocky Mountain News presses silenced</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/26/rocky-mountain-news-presses-slienced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/26/rocky-mountain-news-presses-slienced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two months short of the 150th anniversary of the first run, the presses at Denver&#8217;s Rocky Mountain News are running for the last time tonight. E.W. Scripps CEO Rich Boehne and newspaper division leader Mark Contreras abruptly told employees this morning that Friday&#8217;s edition would be the last. Online editor Mike Noe is tweeting the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two months short of the 150th anniversary of the first run, the presses at Denver&#8217;s <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com">Rocky Mountain News</a> are running for the last time tonight. <a href="http://www.scripps.com">E.W. Scripps</a> CEO Rich Boehne and newspaper division leader Mark Contreras abruptly told employees this morning that Friday&#8217;s edition would be the last. Online editor Mike Noe is tweeting the last night as @<a href="http://twitter.com/RMN_Newsroom">RMN_Newsroom</a>. Reading it is equally sickening and heartbreaking. Launched earlier today, <a href="http://whokilledtherocky.com/">whokilledtherocky.com</a>, is a place to vent and <a href="http://www.poynter.org">Poynter </a>has created a group for support (you have to <a href="https://poynter.yourmembership.com/general/login.asp?e=">join the Poynter community</a> site to see it). The Rocky was locked in a bitter rate war with the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com">Denver Post</a> for years, entering into a joint operating agreement about a decade ago. Sadly, the Rocky survived the war only to die in the peace. Good luck, friends. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5877&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/26/rocky-mountain-news-presses-slienced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay trial underway, many charges dropped in first day</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/pirate-bay-trial-underway-many-charges-dropped-in-first-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/pirate-bay-trial-underway-many-charges-dropped-in-first-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Matt Drudge is cautioning against banks following the feared &#8220;Swedish Model,&#8221; the Swedish megatorrent site The Pirate Bay is fending off the legal broadsides of the global entertainment industry in a long-awaited trial that got underway earlier this week. On the first day, prosecutors dropped half of the charges against the site: Prosecutors previously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Matt Drudge is cautioning against banks following the feared &#8220;<a href="http://gawker.com/5155713/fear-the-swedish-model">Swedish Model</a>,&#8221; the Swedish megatorrent site The Pirate Bay is fending off the legal broadsides of the global entertainment industry in a long-awaited trial that got underway earlier this week.  On the first day, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10165604-38.html">prosecutors dropped half of the charges against the site</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Prosecutors previously accused the defendants, who have insisted that their Web site is legal under Swedish law, of assisting in the distribution of copyrighted material. The amended charges focus on the act of making the material available. </p></blockquote>
<p>The site has maintained that they have no material on their servers, only offering their search mechanism to find relevant torrents to download movies, games, and other copyrighted content. Pirate Bay&#8217;s founders are <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/159442/tweet_the_pirate_bay_trial.html">encouraging crowdsourcing</a> of the trial coverage on the twitter hashtag #spectrial. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5870&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/pirate-bay-trial-underway-many-charges-dropped-in-first-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>198</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ustream launches pay-as-you-go Watershed</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/ustream-launches-pay-as-you-go-watershed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/ustream-launches-pay-as-you-go-watershed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ustream.tv has just launched a new service for Web sites and businesses called Watershed. Targeting the market that seeks a branded player and more customization for live events, Watershed offers a ton of management options outside the scope of the usual ustream player experience. Techcrunch has a good write up with a comparison sheet on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ustream.tv has just launched a new service for Web sites and businesses called <a href="https://watershed.ustream.tv/">Watershed</a>. Targeting the market that seeks a branded player and more customization for live events, Watershed offers a ton of management options outside the scope of the usual ustream player experience. Techcrunch has <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/">a good write up with a comparison sheet on the pricing model</a>, noting that cloud computing model could end up being very pricey for a lot of producers. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5869&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/18/ustream-launches-pay-as-you-go-watershed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public media feels the pinch</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/16/public-media-feels-the-pinch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/16/public-media-feels-the-pinch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pure advertising isn&#8217;t the only business model out there feeling pain. Membership and sponsorship models that sustain public broadcasting are also feeling the effects of the economic downturn, as this article on WAMU public radio shows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure advertising isn&#8217;t the only business model out there feeling pain. Membership and sponsorship models that sustain public broadcasting are also feeling the effects of the economic downturn, as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/13/AR2009021303270.html">this article </a>on WAMU public radio shows. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5867&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/16/public-media-feels-the-pinch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons in paid content from the digital broadcast transition</title>
		<link>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/15/lessons-in-paid-content-from-the-digital-broadcast-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/15/lessons-in-paid-content-from-the-digital-broadcast-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lostremote.com/?p=5864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington Post staff writers Kim Hart and Peter Whoriskey dish out a wonderful narrative in their article on the Washington conundrum that has turned the digital broadcast transition into a comedy of errors: But with two federal agencies in charge, no clear idea of how many people would be affected and constant partisan disagreements over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post staff writers Kim Hart and Peter Whoriskey dish out <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/13/AR2009021303504.html?sub=AR">a wonderful narrative in their article</a> on the Washington conundrum that has turned the digital broadcast transition into a comedy of errors: </p>
<blockquote><p>But with two federal agencies in charge, no clear idea of how many people would be affected and constant partisan disagreements over money, the program foundered just before its long-standing Feb. 17 deadline. It has now been pushed back four months.</p>
<p>The result is confusion for the millions of Americans for whom the television is not simply another electronic device in the home but a crucial source of news and information. The idea that the government might deprive people of television reception strikes some as unjust and, in the event of emergencies, possibly dangerous. </p></blockquote>
<p>Getting out from under legacy systems isn&#8217;t easy, as anyone who has to deal in content management and IT dependencies know. We also want our customers to become stakeholders, but this is so big it can teach us whole new lessons. In the context of our recent industry conversation on paid content online, congress&#8217; move to hold off the big DTV cutoff for reasons above should make everyone stop and think. </p>
<p>The new deadline for the transition is June 12. </p>
<img src="http://www.lostremote.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5864&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lostremote.com/2009/02/15/lessons-in-paid-content-from-the-digital-broadcast-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

